Distributed Consensus with Finite Message Passing
نویسندگان
چکیده
Inspired by distributed resource allocation problems in dynamic topology networks, we initiate the study of distributed consensus with finite messaging passing. We first find a sufficient condition on the network graph for which no distributed protocol can guarantee a conflict-free allocation after R rounds of message passing. Secondly we fully characterize the conflict minimizing zero-round protocol for path graphs, namely random allocation, which partitions the graph into small conflict groups. Thirdly, we enumerate all one-round protocols for path graphs and show that the best one further partitions each of the smaller groups. Finally, we show that the number of conflicts decrease to zero as the number of available resources increase.
منابع مشابه
Byzantine consensus in asynchronous message-passing systems: a survey
Consensus is a classical distributed systems problem with both theoretical and practical interest. Asynchronous Byzantine consensus is currently at the core of some solutions for the implementation of highlyresilient computing services. This paper surveys Byzantine consensus in message-passing distributed systems, by presenting the main theoretical results in the area, the main classes of algor...
متن کاملAn Improved Token-Based and Starvation Free Distributed Mutual Exclusion Algorithm
Distributed mutual exclusion is a fundamental problem of distributed systems that coordinates the access to critical shared resources. It concerns with how the various distributed processes access to the shared resources in a mutually exclusive manner. This paper presents fully distributed improved token based mutual exclusion algorithm for distributed system. In this algorithm, a process which...
متن کاملEdsger W . Dijkstra Prize in Distributed Computing
In 1985 Fischer, Lynch, and Paterson (FLP) proved that consensus is not attainable in asynchronous message passing systems with failures. In the following years, Loui and Abu-Amara, and Herlihy proved that solving consensus in an asynchronous shared memory system is harder than implementing a read/write register. However, it was not known whether read/ write registers are implementable in async...
متن کاملA Unified Proof of Minimum Time Complexity for Reaching Consensus and Uniform Consensus - An Oracle-Based Approach
In this paper, we offer new proofs to two lower bound results in distributed computing: a minimum of f + 1 and f + 2 rounds for reaching consensus and uniform consensus respectively when at most f fail-stop faults can happen. Here the computation model is synchronous message passing. Both proofs are based on a novel oracle argument. These two induction proofs are unified in the following sense:...
متن کاملGossiping in Message-Passing Systems
We study the gossip problem in a message-passing environment: When a process receives a message, it has to decide whether the sender has more recent information on other processes than itself. This problem is at the heart of many distributed algorithms, and it is tightly related to questions from formal methods concerning the expressive power of distributed automata. We provide a non-determinis...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1006.1727 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010